HARBAUGH'S COVER-THE-SPREAD OFFENSE
Saturday night. My good buddy Mark Beech of SI and I are headed northbound on the New Jersey Turnpike through a driving rain storm. Somehow, I'm not exactly sure how, we pick up the closing minutes of the USC-Stanford game on radio in Pine Barren country.
What happens in the closing minutes is fascinating. And warrants investigation.
USC, which was tied with Stanford 17-17 at halftime, scores four consecutive touchdowns in the second half. The last Trojan touchdown comes with just 1:32 remaining, a 3-yard burst up the middle by Stephon Johnson. That made the score 45-17 in USC's favor.
You can argue that USC should have just taken a knee at that point--it was 2nd down and they could have run out the clock. On the other hand, the Trojans ran the ball all ten plays of their drive. They certainly weren't calling plays as if they were trying to run up the score.
Cut to Stanford, mounting a drive of its own, a meaningless drive (or so you'd think) in the closing seconds. With six second left and the ball on the USC 31, Stanford coach Jim Harbaugh calls a timeout. "Oh my God," I'm laughing to myself when the Westwood One play-by-play man (never got his name) says this. Did Captain Comeback really call a timeout with six seconds left?
No, he di'unt.
Yes, he did.
And then Stanford completed a 13-yard pass to the 18--to former Notre Dame tight end Konrad Reuland, no less, who stepped out of bounds.
Three seconds left. And Harbaugh sends in his field goal unit.
No, he di'unt!
Yes, he did.
So--and this is why Pete Carroll is my favorite football coach-- USC counterpunches by calling a timeout. To ice Stanford's kicker. With a 28-point lead and three ticks on the clock.
Jim, Pete: Why not just get a tape measure, drop trou and get it over with? I mean, seriously.
So, okay, you're going to ice my kicker? Then I'm going to send out my offense again and take a pop toward the end zone. Which the Cardinal does. And they find a Stanford receiver pretty wide open in the end zone for six. Touchdown, Cardinal!
Game over. But touchdown, Cardinal! And that makes the final score 45-23.
And what happened next made me laugh out loud. Or, as the kids say, "LOL". Because I was thinking it, but I never dreamt that the announcer would say it. But he did. And this is what he said: "THAT JUST MADE A LOT OF PEOPLE IN NEVADA VERY UNHAPPY."
No, he di'unt.
Oh yes he did.
See, USC was favored in this game by 24 points. So if you bet on USC to win you loved when Johnson scored a meaningless TD with 1:32 remaining, because USC's lead went from 21 points to 28. And I've done some stories on gamblers before, and believe me, almost every one of them would tell you that USC's coaching staff knew exactly what the spread was and that figured into their call.
But of this I can be absolutely certain: You could never convince any seasoned gambler that Harbaugh's last-second touchdown was motivated by anything other than a desire to beat the spread. I am not alleging that it was. And I'm certainly not alleging that any member of the Cardinal coaching staff or player roster bet on this game.
But you'll never convince a seasoned gambler that Harbaugh wasn't influenced in some fashion by the spread. Meanwhile, somewhere in Las Vegas tonight there's a guy who can lay claim to having put more money on USC minus the 24 points than anyone else in the city. Maybe 5 G. Maybe 10.
And right now that man has flames in his eyes. And tonight in Las Vegas, that dude may be even more lethal than Brock Lesnar.
The Associated Press did not mention the spread in its game story. SportsCenter did not mention the spread in its recap. Both organizations noted the late-game shenanigans, but neither alluded to how they affected the spread. You can bet that on gambling message boards right now this ending is already taking on legendary proportions.
And while it may have just been a case of gamesmanship between Harbaugh and Carroll, two alpha-alpha males, the Pac-10 should at least broach this matter with the two of them. Because, while neither coach is accountable to the bookies and their sucke--um, bettors--, the ending of that game sends up a lot of red flags.
*********************
Beech, as he hears a report that Troy has gone up 31-3 on LSU in the 3rd quarter, somewhere near the New Brunswick exit: "It's not enough."
Beech, as he hears that LSU is up 34-31 on Troy in the 4th quarter as we near the George Washington Bridge: "College football is the greatest sport."
I agree.
***********************
Hate to sound like a broken record, but how psyched are you for the Texas Tech-Oklahoma game next Saturday? Do you remember hearing that Alabama was trailing Mississippi State in the 2nd quarter and thinking, When is the next screen crawl coming with an update?
If we had a playoff, trust me, neither of those games would be such a big deal. Tech-OU wouldn't even determine the Big 12 South winner outright, not yet, and that would be just one of six to eight spots available in a playoff. And so what if Alabama had lost to MSU? They'd still be SEC West champs. They'd still be going to the SEC Championship game with a berth in the playoffs on the line.
You want a playoff? Then most regular season (and there is no "regular season" per se in college football; the "playoff" begins on opening weekend...but I realize that's just semantics) games of "importance" have the same juice as today's North Carolina-Maryland game. A close game, for sure. Two pretty good teams with a solid shot of becoming the ACC champ.
But neither one great, and neither one deserving of being called the best team in the nation.
Yet, if we have a playoff, UNC-Maryland is every bit as "big" as Texas Tech-Oklahoma. Because the stakes are the same: a berth in the eight-team playoff.
I feel sorry for playoff advocates more than anything else. I feel sad that supposedly intelligent people cannot understand, as they find themselves captivated each and every Saturday (even this one, a supposedly "boring" weekend of college football), that the every essence of what captivates them is the alchemy of the unknown each week. Institute a playoff and you destroy that.
Institute a playoff and you'll forever crush those moments when your friend phones or texts saying,"Are you watching the USC-Stanford game?"
Because, see, the Trojans may not win the Pac-10 this season, but they still could go to the national championship game. So, when it was 17-17 at the half, everyone interested in the national championship was invested, not just Pac-10 fans. But if we had a playoff system, well, it would have only impacted the Pac-10. And, well, how closely did you follow the Cal-Oregon State game? Exactly.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: HARBAUGH'S COVER-THE-SPREAD OFFENSE.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.nbcsports.com/system/mt-tb.cgi/10563
11 Comments
Leave a comment
About this blog
NBC Sports Blogs is your home for insider information, rumors and hard-hitting opinions on what's hot in the world of sports.
"...alchemy of the unknown" ~ nice
You should also check out the end of the Stanford - San Jose St. game earlier in the year. Stanford was favored by 10 or 11 points, and was up 16-10 with 9 seconds left in the game. They had the ball at the San Jose St. 2 yard line and should have taken a knee to end the game but, instead, Harbaugh went for a meaningless touchdown on the last play of the game and Stanford got the cover. I knew at that time that Harbaugh was well aware of the point spread and was covering it for his boosters. I was also listening to the USC - Stanford game last night on the NJ Turnpike as I was driving home from Penn State where I was at the game yesterday. I heard the game on XM radio. I knew that Harbaugh was going to try to beat the spread again. He was never going to kick that field goal since it wouldn't have covered the spread. The PAC 10 and the NCAA should investigate this guy and all the other coaches that I have seen this year go for covers at the end of games that are already decided. Believe me, Harbaugh isn't the only one, he is just the most obvious. They are all trying to please their boosters.
JW, not only did I get victimized by the Nevada crowd on Harbaugh's last play of the game, but again Sunday in the Steelers v. Chargers finish. Are you freaking kidding me???? The NFL, after the game said that they screwed up, but those of us that are watching these games for reasons other than the fans of said teams paid a price bigger than the 7th playoff tie-breaker.
I love the "supposedly intelligent people cannot understand" comment. I agree. A playoff not only makes the best regular season in sports less relevant, but actually would make things even more chaotic than it stands now. It's pretty clear now - win all your games. Don't & you leave things to chance. Giving teams a 2nd chance just makes the "who gets in" question worse. The more teams in any playoff proposal creates greater dillsuion of the regular season.
And on to another of my favorite topics, not understood by some "supposedly Intelligent people": the Line. The only thing Vegas tries to do with the Line is get an even amount of betting on both sides. They make 10% on the total amount bet. Nothing makes them happier than getting the exact same amount bet on both teams. When it is out of whack is when the Line moves - to entice betting on the other side. They ARE NOT trying to predict the outcome of the final score. They are trying to find a number that will make the public (& pro bettors) just as likely to bet one side or the other.
Sure boosters tend to bet on their own team. And it would make sense that a coach might want to keep his boosters happy by covering. But Vegas doesn't care. If they've done their job & acheived equal dollars on both sides, LV doesn't make any more money when one team covers over another. In fact, when the betting at one shop is disproportionate on one team, they look to Lay Off some excess at a competitors shop that has too much on the other side. It's rare that balance is not acheived. Pro or College.
How can USC possibly be considered for the NC, when they most likely won't even with their conference. if you don't win your conference, there is no way you should go to the NC, and USC's conference doesn't even have a championship game. What a lame PAC-10 and what lame pollsters for constantly trying to get USC into the NC mix! If you are going to complain to get into the NC game, then have a good argument like Auburn did in 2004 going undefeated in the SEC, and winning the SEC championship game. Even under those circumstances, Tommy Tubberville didn't Overly pitch the pollsters which showed class, but also cost Auburn a chance to go, other than very biased pollsters that wanted to see a classic USC - Oklahoma NC. it isn't about who would look the best in the NC, it's about who's the best. Because of the obvious biases, and anonymous votes by the pollsters than can influence the computers, then we MUST have a playoff. Want to hear less complaining for one, then first step is to make all votes public so coaches and voters have to defend an attrocious and questionable ranking.
I certainly don't blame Stanford for doing what they did. It had nothing to do with the spread. It had everything to do with Pete Carroll and USD scoring with less than a minute left instead of taking a knee.
Everyone needs to take a deep breath. These are heated games in a conference head to head. Why shouldn't either team score when it has the ball. I believe that is the object of the game?
USC ran the ball on consecutive plays. They scored. Then Stanford takes the kickoff and drives down. Had Jimmy not sent the field goal team out and just went for it and scored I wouldn't even be typing this silly note.
Great game. Great finish. Too bad so many Stanford faithful missed it as they left midway through the 4th quarter. Having been at the game I would say the stands were 70-30 USC to Stanford fans anyway.
Go Cardinal
is any sport realy fair anymore!put pete rose in the hall of fame already alright geez
are they really any fair sports anymore! put pete rose in the hall of fame already geez
Are you kidding me? Too bad if your team lost, didn't cover the point spread, etc. Let the teams play ball, let the bettors keep betting. That's why they call it GAMBLING.
ed hardy sweaters
ed hardy swim trunks